Impact of rye cover crops on preemergence herbicide activity

April 17, 2017 3:54 PM

A common question regarding cover crops is will interception of preemergence herbicides by the cover crop reduce the activity of the herbicides. If this was a consistent problem, it would make sense to apply the preemergence herbicide in a separate application from the burndown after much of the cover crop residue has degraded.  The primary concern is that the preemergence herbicide will be absorbed into the cover crop and not be released into the soil profile with rainfall.  Numerous interactions occur between the cover crop, weeds, herbicide, soil and environment in these situations, making it difficult to predict exactly what will happen.  Following are some thoughts on the risks; the lack of information from other states with a longer history of cover crops suggests it is not a major problem.

The potential for a cover crop decreasing the activity of a preemergence herbicide will increase as termination is delayed and the cover crop accumulates more biomass.  More herbicide will be intercepted and the cover crop will degrade more slowly, therefore tying up more herbicide for a longer period of time.  Some herbicide could be degraded by the cover crop before it is killed by the burndown herbicide, or the herbicide could be metabolized by microbes that degrade the cover crop residue.  However, I suspect degradation of the herbicide within the cover crop is less of an issue than the physical tie-up within the cover crop.

Separate herbicide applications probably aren’t warranted when rye is terminated before it reaches a height of 12-18 inches.  With later termination, there may be a benefit to delaying application of the preemergence herbicide until early post (V1-V2 crop stage).  When termination is delayed, the rye may produce sufficient biomass to suppress weed emergence early in the growing season.  Applying the preemergence herbicide early post rather than with the burndown treatment will extend activity of the preemergence product later into the season.  This practice limits preemergence options to products that can be applied following crop emergence.

I would only recommend separating the burndown and preemergence herbicides in fields with a dense, uniform stand of cereal rye.  A non-uniform stand of the cover crop would leave areas ‘unprotected’ following planting, putting greater pressure on the postemergence product.  This would increase both the likelihood of control failures and the selection pressure on weeds for herbicide resistance.

Preemergence herbicides are routinely applied to crop residue in no-till fields with little impact on their activity.  With crop residues, the herbicide remains on the surface of the residue and is easily washed off with rainfall.  With cover crops, the herbicide can be absorbed into the plant where it is less available to move into the soil profile where preemergence herbicides are active.  The decision whether to use single or sequential applications of burndown and preemergence herbicides should be based on the amount of cover crop biomass, and also the cost and time requirements for multiple applications.

Blog Post
Category: 
Author: 

Bob Hartzler Professor of Agronomy

Dr. Bob Hartzler is a professor of agronomy and an extension weed specialist. He conducts research on weed biology and how it impacts the efficacy of weed management programs in corn and soybean. Dr. Hartzler also teaches undergraduate classes in weed science and weed identificatio...