Corn Hail Loss Chart and Things to Consider Following Hail

August 11, 2009
ICM News

By Roger Elmore, Department of Agronomy

Hail storms again devastated portions of Iowa's corn crop on Aug. 9. Storms cut a 1 to 8 mile swath across north central Iowa. Producers in its path are asking, "How does hail after tasseling affect yield?" 

Most corn in the affected area was in the blister stage (R2).  According to hail industry tables, complete leaf loss at R2 results in 73 percent yield loss (see table).  Amount of leaf loss as well as development stage greatly impacts losses.  For example, if half of the leaves are lost, yields are reduced by 22 percent.  Damage at tasseling, VT, affects yield more severely while losses both earlier and later in development are less severe. 

Table 1.  Estimated percent yield reduction caused by hail damage.

 yield reduction due to hail

Consider a few other things relative to hail damage:

• Stand losses also occur with hail storms.  Yield losses are directly related the number of plants broken below the ear at these later development stages. For example a 10 percent stand loss — plants broken below the ear will result in a 10 percent yield loss in addition to any losses from defoliation.

• Bruises on stalks and ear husks may allow pathogen entrance, thus further reducing yields and increasing issues with stalk and grain quality.

• No research data supports fungicide applications as a method to improve crop recovery.

• If a portion of the crop is worth harvesting, adjust combines well.  Volunteer corn will likely be a problem in 2010 whether the crop is harvested or not.

These losses are devastating.  Prior to the storm, the crop looked better than ever.  Recovery of the crop, and growers, will be difficult.

For more information see the article on assessing hail damage from the National Corn Handbook.

Roger Elmore is a professor of agronomy with research and extension responsibilities in corn production. Elmore can be contacted by email at or (515) 294-6655.


Links to this article are strongly encouraged, and this article may be republished without further permission if published as written and if credit is given to the author, Integrated Crop Management News, and Iowa State University Extension and Outreach. If this article is to be used in any other manner, permission from the author is required. This article was originally published on August 11, 2009. The information contained within may not be the most current and accurate depending on when it is accessed.