Myths and Facts about Residue Breakdown

April 4, 2014
ICM News

By Mahdi Al-Kaisi, Department of Agronomy

Crop residue serves an important role in physically protecting soil by preventing soil erosion during rain events or high winds.  Also, crop residue plays a significant role in enhancing the soil biological community by providing sources of organic carbon and nitrogen for its energy or food needs.  To understand how residue decomposes or breaks down, we need to understand the processes and mechanisms that include both biological and chemical activities influenced by environmental and soil conditions, namely air and soil temperatures, soil moisture availability, soil pH, oxygen, and type of microbial community.  The composition of crop residue includes lignin, cellulose, hemicellulose, and macro and micro nutrients.  To release or breakdown and decompose most of these organic forms, certain biological and enzymatic processes controlled by a wide range of microorganisms influenced by other factors have to occur to these materials at various rates as influenced by the environment and soil conditions.

In agriculture, annual cropping systems and other ecosystems management can influence these factors that are critical to the process of residue breakdown.  However, there is a common belief among many farmers and agronomists that the physical change in crop residue structure or orientation in the field by tillage can accelerate residue breakdown by cutting crop residue into small pieces or burying residue by tillage.  Also, there is the belief that the application of nitrogen fertilizer on crop residue (i.e., corn residue) after harvest can speed up the process of residue breakdown.  Both assertions are not correct.

Tillage Effects on Residue Breakdown

Recently, we conducted a study to examine the effect of three different tillage systems that include deep tillage (DT), strip-tillage (ST), and no-till (NT) on residue breakdown of both Bt and non-Bt corn residues.  The results of this three-year field and laboratory incubation study show no significant differences in the breakdown or percent of residue that remained among the three tillage systems of Bt and non-Bt corn hybrid decomposition.  Also, in these studies after 12 months, there was no difference between tillage systems or Bt and non-Bt residue hybrids breakdown in the field, where 34—49 percent of the corn residue still remained on the soil surface.  The results of the residue decomposition study are presented in Figure 1, in which the residue decomposition rate is represented by CO2-C release. The results show no significant difference in the breakdown or decomposition due to tillage or type of residue (Bt or non-Bt).

Fig. 1. Rate of CO2-C released as an indicator of residue breakdown/decomposition from control (bare soil) and Bt and non-Bt corn residue mixed into the soil or unmixed with soil (left on soil surface). Asterisk represents CO2-C released rates from treatments that were significantly different from control for the corresponding days at the 0.05 probability level using the least significant difference. (/files/icm/btvsnonbtpaper-2013.pdf)

Nitrogen Fertilizer Application Effects on Residue Breakdown

The results of corn residue decomposition with different N rates in the no-tillage system under field conditions are presented in Figure 2a of the two-year study. Corn residue decomposition was evaluated by applying three N rates (UAN 32 percent), 0, 30 and 60 lb N/acre to corn residue immediately after harvest, in which specific amounts of corn residue were weighed and placed in nylon mesh bags and left in the field immediately after harvest for decomposition evaluation. The rate of residue decomposition was evaluated every three months for the entire year (12 months).

Fig. 2. Nitrogen (N) effect on (a) residue breakdown in the field, (b) residue breakdown in the laboratory under 32 degrees F and (c) residue breakdown in the laboratory at 90o F room temperatures.

The results showed that corn residue decomposition increased with time with lesser amounts of residue remaining after each evaluation period. There were no differences in the rate of residue decomposition as a result of N application of different N rates.  These results show that applying N fertilizer to facilitate residue decomposition is not effective. The timing of N application for corn residue decomposition immediately after harvest, as practiced, is not an effective strategy, as the soil and air temperatures decrease over time after fall harvest. The decomposition of crop residue is highly controlled by soil moisture and temperature as essential factors for microbial activity for the residue decomposition.  Therefore, from economic and environmental perspectives, N application has little effect in achieving the intended results of facilitating residue decomposition.

The same results were observed with laboratory evaluation of corn residue decomposition that was conducted with the same residue treated with different N rates in the field study. Corn residue samples from the field were incubated in the laboratory under constant temperatures of 32 degrees F and 90 degrees F for approximately 30 days each (Fig. 2b and 2c).  The rate of corn residue decomposition under laboratory conditions followed a similar trend as that in the field. Similar to the results of the field study, no differences in residue decomposition/breakdown with different N rates were found. The laboratory study results confirmed the field results and demonstrated the role of temperature in controlling corn residue decomposition rather than N rate, in which a slower rate of residue decomposition was observed at the low temperature (32  degrees F) and increased at the higher temperature (90 degrees F) (Fig. 2b and 2c) without any effect of N application on residue breakdown. 


The use of tillage or N application to increase residue decomposition can be counterproductive from economic and environmental perspectives.  From an economic perspective, both options of management can add additional cost to the management input in terms of materials, time, labor, fuel, and equipment costs. Environmentally, both tillage and N application are not very sustainable practices; tillage can contribute to soil health and water quality deterioration by increasing soil erosion potential, sediment loss and water quality degradation, as do N applications, where no growing plant can utilize it.  Our research and many other studies do not support such practices regardless of the justification or claims that propose tillage equipment can manage residue.  Disturbing the soil does not constitute an improvement in soil quality nor increase in residue decomposition.  Residue decomposition is controlled by biological processes that are influenced by environmental and soil conditions.

Mahdi Al-Kaisi is a professor of agronomy with research and extension responsibilities in soil management and environmental soil science. He can be reached at or 515-294-8304.


Links to this article are strongly encouraged, and this article may be republished without further permission if published as written and if credit is given to the author, Integrated Crop Management News, and Iowa State University Extension and Outreach. If this article is to be used in any other manner, permission from the author is required. This article was originally published on April 4, 2014. The information contained within may not be the most current and accurate depending on when it is accessed.