When looking for soybean varieties, it is important to give as much thought to the process as you give to choosing corn hybrids. If you only choose one or two soybean varieties and do not take into consideration management and environmental factors of your operation, you are likely limiting yield potential.
Many of the factors that apply to choosing corn hybrids apply to soybean variety selection as well. Choose high-yielding soybean varieties. You cannot achieve high yields from low-yielding genetics. Look for varieties that perform well from field to field and year to year. Take into account your unique management and environmental situation by choosing varieties that are well suited for your management practices and field conditions. When weighing these factors, use all the data you can find to make your decision. Look at performance trials done by a university, your own performance trials, seed company reports, as well as strip trial results from other farmers, FFA clubs, and cooperatives.
Maturity selection is another thing to keep in mind when you choose soybean varieties. You can minimize the effects of adverse weather and expand the harvest window by planting varieties with different maturities. Keep in mind that generally speaking, later maturing soybeans have higher yields. It can be a challenge to compare maturities among seed companies. Actual maturities may vary and are highly influenced by environmental factors. It is recommended to plant varieties with a range of 0.5 to 1.0 maturity group.
Disease and herbicide traits
Transgenic options in soybean varieties are limited to the various herbicide traits. Choose the herbicide traits and technologies that make sense to achieve control of your weed populations. Plant breeding efforts have resulted in the development of soybean varieties with resistance or tolerance to soybean cyst nematodes (SCN), sudden death syndrome (SDS), brown stem rot, iron deficiency chlorosis (IDC), white mold, and phytopthora.
In Iowa, the most important trait to look for is resistance to SCN, since SCN can reduce soybean yield by up to 30%. SCN is known to interact with SDS and IDC. Because of this, managing SCN is extremely beneficial in the presence of SDS and IDC. Management of SDS and IDC can be particularly effective when using genetic selection to minimize impacts in the field. However, newer pesticide technology is also available for SDS control. Soybean varieties are often rated on phytophthora and white mold resistance. Identifying varieties with resistance or tolerance to these diseases should be considered. However, don’t sacrifice high yielding genetics. All these factors need to be balanced with what can be managed by genetic selection or other available control measures.
Standability and shattering
Standability and shattering should also be considered. Soybeans planted at higher seeding rates or in fields with high fertility are more susceptible to lodging due to taller plant growth. If lodging becomes a significant factor in your fields, it could reduce yield and slow harvest progress. Pod shattering is typically associated with harvest delays where seed moisture falls below 13% and then goes through rehydration and drying cycles. Shattering can be minimized by paying attention to variety scores as well as selecting a range of soybean maturity groups.
Finally, as you consider all these factors, don’t forget to keep seed cost in mind. The highest-yielding variety may not be the most profitable. Seed cost must be balanced with yield potential as well as other management costs. Using genetics to manage weeds, insects, and diseases may provide a greater return on investment than relying on pesticides, or at least it will provide an alternative for risk management.
Links to this article are strongly encouraged, and this article may be republished without further permission if published as written and if credit is given to the author, Integrated Crop Management News, and Iowa State University Extension and Outreach. If this article is to be used in any other manner, permission from the author is required. This article was originally published on October 3, 2017. The information contained within may not be the most current and accurate depending on when it is accessed.